PIERRE BOURDIEU, SANG JURU DAMAI PIERRE BOURDIEU, THE PEACEFUL
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pierre Bourdieu built his theoretical orientation as a solution to what he saw as a false opposition between objectivism and subjectivism; to quote Bourdieu: “absurd opposition between individual and society”. Bourdieu offered a point of view that emphasizes on duality in the relationship between agent and structure, as an alternative to the previously existing dualistic views. Bourdieu refers to his theoretical orientation as genetic structuralism, constructivist structuralism or structuralist constructivism. Through the concept of habitus, field, and capital, Bourdieu integrated objectivism (which emphasizes the role of objective structure in social practice) and subjectivism (which emphasizes the role of agent in social practice). Bourdieu formulated the theory of social practice with the equation (Habitus x Capital) + Field = Practice. Practice, in Bourdieu’s mind, is the product of the relationship between habitus and field, wherein within field itself there are powers at stake, especially between people with capital and people without capital.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2014 Nanang Krisdinanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bourdieu, Pierre dan Loic J.D Wacquant. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1990a). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1990b). The Logic of Practise, California, Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1993). The Field on Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (2004). The Algerians, Toronto, Beacon Press.
Cabin, Phillipe dan Francois Dortier. (2005). Sosiologi: Sejarah dan Berbagai Pemikirannya, Yogyakarta, Kreasi Wacana.
Calhoun, Craig. (1993). Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Perspective, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Grenfell, Michael dan Cheryl Hardy. (2007). Art Rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the Visual Arts, New York, Berg.
Grenfell, Michael. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, Trowbirdge, Cromwell Press.
Haryatmoko, “Landasan Teoritis Gerakan Sosial Menurut Pierre Bourdieu: Menyingkap Kepalsuan Budaya Penguasa, dalam Basis No. 11 – 12, Tahun Ke-52, November – Desember 2003
Jenkins, Richard. (1992). Key Sociologist: Pierre Bourdieu, London, Routledge.
Lechte, John. (2001). 50 Filsuf Kontemporer: Dari Strukturalisme sampai Posmodernisme, Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
Mahar, Chleen dan Richard Harker. (2010). (Habitus X Modal) + Ranah = Praktik: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu, Jogjakarta, Jalasutra.
Mutahir, Arizal. (2011). Intelektual Kolektif Pierre Bourdieu: Sebuah Gerakan untuk Melawan Dominasi, Yogyakarta, Kreasi Wacana.
Nicholash, Dirk et.al. (1994). Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Poloma, Margareth. (2003). Sosiologi Kontemporer, Jakarta. PT Raja Grafindo.
Ritzer, George dan Douglas J. Goodman. (2004). Teori Sosiologi Modern, Jakarta, Kencana.
Robin, Derek. (1991). The Work of Pierre Bourdieu: Recognizing Society, San Fransisco, Westview Press.
Susen, Simon dan Bryan S. Turner. (2011). The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, London, Anthem Press.
Swartz, David. (1977). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, London, The University of Chicago Press.
Webb, Jen, et.al. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu, London, SAGE Publication.